States May Lose $8.4 Billion in U.S. Funds by Rejecting Medicaid

By Alex Wayne

June 04, 2013


Texas, Louisiana and 12 other U.S. states that are declining to expand Medicaid under President Barack Obama’s health overhaul will lose at least $8.4 billion in federal funding in 2016 alone, a study found.

About 3.6 million people who would have been eligible for Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act will be left without health insurance, costing the 14 states an additional $1 billion in uncompensated care, according to research from the Rand Corp. published in the journal Health Affairs. States “would do best to expand Medicaid,” the researchers said.

“State policy makers should be aware that if they do not expand Medicaid, fewer people will have health insurance and state and local governments will have to bear higher costs for uncompensated care,” wrote Carter Price and Christine Eibner, researchers with the Rand Corp. in Arlington, Virginia.

About 25 million Americans are projected to gain insurance under the health-care law, including 13 million through the state-federal Medicaid program for the poor and the rest through new marketplaces selling subsidized health plans to people who don’t get coverage at their jobs. Most Republican governors have balked at the Medicaid expansion, citing costs to their states despite the federal government’s plans to cover 100 percent of the tab for the first three years and at least 90 percent in the years following.


‘Hollow’ Promise

“The federal government’s promise of billions of dollars in the coming years is hollow,” said U.S. Representative Joseph Pitts of Pennsylvania, a Republican who chairs the health subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. “These projections are based on a government already trillions of dollars in debt finding a way to pay for a massive expansion of state programs.”

Pennsylvania has so far chosen not to participate in the Medicaid expansion.

Texas Governor Rick Perry, a Republican, has resisted calls to expand Medicaid in his state, where a higher proportion of the population is uninsured than anywhere else in the country. The expansion would cost taxpayers too much, he said.

“They tell us to take the money — in the case of Texas, $4 billion — because it’s free,” Perry said in a speech on March 14 in Washington. “But there is nothing free. This is our money, or at least money that we’ve tacked onto the national debt either by borrowing from China or by pulling it right off the printing presses.”

While the Rand researchers assume 14 states would refuse to expand Medicaid, as many as 20 have yet to act, according to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit group based in Menlo Park, California, that tracks the progress of the health law.


Eligibility Rules

The health law makes all Americans eligible for Medicaid if their incomes don’t exceed 138 percent of the federal poverty level, or about $32,500 for a family of four this year. In states that don’t expand the program, people earning poverty-level wages and higher who don’t get insurance at their jobs will be able to buy policies on the new health exchanges. To help pay premiums, they’ll get subsidies that diminish as their income rises to 400 percent of the poverty level, or about $94,200 for a family of four.

Working-age adults who earn less than the poverty line and live in states that don’t expand Medicaid are unlikely to qualify for the program because of “restrictive eligibility requirements,” the Rand researchers said yesterday in their report. Most states currently don’t offer Medicaid to childless adults

To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Wayne in Washington at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Reg Gale at


Article Link:

The big question for health insurance exchanges is the cost

June 5, 2013 9:36 am by Christine Vestal, Stateline |


Consumers want to know: Will health insurance cost more, less, or about the same on the new health insurance exchanges?

Politicians, for their own reasons, have the same question about the impact of the Affordable Care Act on insurance in 2014.

California recently announced the prices of plans that have been approved for the exchange. Surprising to many, the 2014 rates are substantially lower than comparable plans on the market today, according to Covered California, which runs the exchange.

That’s good news for Californians and for the Obama administration.

Critics of the federal health law have long predicted that its new insurance regulations – such as the requirement that carriers cover people with pre-existing conditions – will cause premium “rate shock.” Proponents counter that the law contains market protections that should keep prices in check. In addition, low income people will receive subsidies to defray higher prices.

Nationwide, the price that uninsured Americans will have to pay for coverage in 2014 will vary widely from state to state. Although early news on premium prices from a handful of states is mostly promising, critics maintain that when exchanges open in all 50 states, the picture may be very different.

Considered the engines of the Obama administration’s health law, the exchanges run by states and the federal government will allow consumers to comparison shop for individual and family coverage and find out whether they qualify for Medicaid or federal tax credits.

Here’s a primer on how insurance rates on the exchanges will be set and why prices might be higher in some states than in others:

Which other states have announced preliminary exchange prices?

Colorado, Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont have made public the prices proposed by insurance companies on the exchange. The plans have not yet been approved.

In all but Maryland, the new rates are about the same or slightly lower than policies already on the market. Maryland’s dominant insurance company – Care First Blue Cross Blue Shield – predicted a 25 percent hike in its premiums.

Until prices are approved by state regulators, they are subject to change. Insurance companies may have to go back to the drawing board if their prices are too high or their policies fail to conform to new requirements in the federal health law. Already, a few carriers have voluntarily withdrawn their proposed prices after seeing how much higher they were compared to the competition.

Why are California’s rates surprising?

According to Covered California, the average price for an individual will be $321 per month, about $100 cheaper than the Congressional Budget Office predicted the national average would be for individual insurance plans.

The new policies offered by 13 different carriers are 2 percent above to 29 percent below the 2013 average premium for small employer plans, the group reported.

Health law critics say California’s comparison is misleading, since it compares the rates of 2014 individual policies to 2013 small employer policies, which are more expensive and include better coverage than individual plans available today.

Others argue that California’s comparison is accurate, since individual plans in 2014 will look more like small employer plans today.

When will all 2014 exchange premium prices be revealed?

The curtain will rise Oct. 1 when health insurance exchanges across the country go live. Until then, state insurance regulators will be reviewing thousands of applications from insurance carriers eager to sell their policies to an estimated 20 million uninsured Americans who will get federal money to purchase insurance – many of them for the first time.

Insurance industry applications started arriving in April and must be approved by July 31. Many states have disclosure laws requiring them to post all insurance rates once they are approved. As a result, state insurance commissions and local media are likely to provide early indications of prices in individual states.

How much can consumers expect to pay for individual coverage?

CBO estimated that the national average premium for an individual would be $5,200 a year, or about $433 per month in 2014. But it will depend on where you live.

Current average insurance rates for an individual range from $136 per month in Alabama to $437 per month in Massachusetts, according to 2010 data compiled by the Kaiser Family Foundation. (KHN is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation.) But insurance policies and the benefits they cover are not the same from state to state, so it is impossible to make an accurate comparison.

Starting in 2014, however, all insurance companies will have to follow the same market rules and offer roughly the same benefits. That should have the effect of evening out rates from state to state over time. But in the process, rates in some states are expected to spike.

The prediction is that prices will be lower or flat in states like Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Rhode Island and Washington. These states already highly regulate insurance policies. States with more lenient regulations may see higher rates once the stricter rules in the federal health law are applied.

Why are premium prices expected to rise?

Insurance companies most often cite the requirement in the federal health law that carriers can no longer deny coverage to someone who is already sick or exclude coverage of their condition. Nor can carriers charge a higher premium price for people in poor health.

But other ACA provisions will also affect the price of premiums in 2014. For example, women cannot be charged a higher rate than men, and older people can only be charged a set amount more than younger people in the same community.

The health law requires all insurance policies – on the exchange and off the exchange – to cover a minimum set of benefits that include mental health and dental care, among other things.

One big concern, though, is that healthy people won’t care whether the new policies offer better coverage. If the price tag is too high, they may choose to pay a federal fine rather than purchase insurance. That would cause premium prices to rise even higher for older and sicker people who do buy insurance.

Who can shop on the exchanges?

Anyone can shop on an insurance exchange. But only those who do not have employer-sponsored insurance or an affordable offer of insurance can apply for federal premium tax credits. “Affordable,” according to the U.S. Treasury Department, means the employee share of premium costs does not exceed 9.5 percent of their income. People who already have insurance but pay for it themselves will be eligible for federal subsidies.

Individual policies offered outside the exchange will have to follow the same market rules and offer the same benefit packages as those on the exchange, so their prices are likely to be similar. But the exchange will make it easier for people to compare policies and choose one that best suits their needs.

How much will premium tax subsidies pay?

For those with incomes from the poverty level ($11,490 for an individual) to four times that annual income ($45,960), the premium tax credits will sharply reduce the price of insurance. Based on projected income for the year ahead, the credits will be paid by the Treasury Department in advance, directly to the insurance company the consumer chooses.

Calculations of the premium tax credit will work much like the current application for federal student aid (FAFSA). Consumers will provide information about their income and the Treasury will determine the individual or family’s ability to pay for insurance.

The aim is to ensure that the cost of insurance does not exceed 2 percent of income for people at the low end of the scale, and 9.5 percent of total income at the top end of the scale. Even though insurance costs will be higher for older people, they will end up paying the same as younger people, because their tax credits will be higher.

Kaiser Family Foundation offers a subsidy calculator to see if you qualify.