ACA Likely to Deliver Bigger Bang in Rural Areas

Published: Jul 29, 2013

By David Pittman, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today

WASHINGTON — The rural uninsured may reap a bigger benefit from the Affordable Care Act than their city-dwelling counterparts, which prompted health policy experts to call for a ramped-up campaign to publicize ACA in rural communities.

More rural residents than urban dwellers (10.7% versus 9.6%) can receive tax subsidies under the ACA to purchase private insurance and more uninsured are eligible for an expanded Medicaid program (9.9% versus 8.5%), Keith Mueller, PhD, director of the Rural Policy Research Institute’s Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis in Iowa City, said.

Educating those uninsured, rural residents about their benefits under the ACA will be vital to the 2010 health law’s success, others said at an Alliance for Health Reform briefing on rural healthcare.

“On a per person basis, we have the potential for more rural folks to benefit from this expansion than their urban counterparts,” Tom Morris, director of the Office of Rural Health Policy at the Health Resources and Services Administration, said. “The next couple of months are going to be critical in terms of getting the word out.”

However, a few obstacles stand in the way of getting those people signed up for either Medicaid or insurance subsidies, panelists at the briefing said.

For example, 30% of New Mexicans who were eligible for Medicaid even before the ACA still are not enrolled because there are barriers to doing so, Art Kaufman, MD, vice chancellor for community health sciences at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center in Albuquerque, said.

“You’ve heard of suppression of votes. There’s also suppression of getting people enrolled,” Kaufman said. “There are so many ways [to suppress enrollment] even a state that has accepted Medicaid [expansion] can slow the process.”

The ACA will provide coverage to those making up to 138% of the federal poverty level in states that chose to expand their programs following last summer’s landmark Supreme Court decision. While its health insurance exchanges will provide online marketplaces for the uninsured to comparison shop and purchase insurance, those making between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level will be eligible for tax subsidies to help offset to cost of coverage.

One of the main obstacles facing the Obama administration and its advocates in their attempts to reach rural residents to tell them about expanded benefits under the ACA is political resistance to “Obamacare” in many states with large rural populations.

Their state leaders have been less willing to back programs that even would enroll or educate the public on ACA programs.

“The more we can start calling these products something else besides Obamacare, the ACA, or whatever … the better off we’re going to be,” Lisa Miller, former member of the Maine House of Representatives, said.

Meanwhile, the Department of Health and Human Services is pumping more than $150 million into community health centers and $54 million for navigator programs to help spur the enrollment process.

Miller said funds are also flowing from an unexpected source: philanthropic organizations that are funding enrollment campaigns.

© 2013 MedPage Today, LLC. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of the MedPageToday.com terms of use and privacy policy. The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Article Link: http://www.medpagetoday.com/Washington-Watch/Reform/40735